|
|
|
| Asymptotic pseudounitary stacking operators | |
|
Next: Post-Stack Time Migration
Up: Migration
Previous: 2. Zero-offset migration
In the case of common-offset migration in a general variable-velocity
medium, the weighting function (46) cannot be simplified to a
different form, and all its components need to be calculated
explicitly by dynamic ray tracing (Cerveny and de Castro, 1993). In the
constant-velocity case, we can differentiate the explicit expression
for the summation path
|
(50) |
where
and
are the lengths of the incident and reflected rays:
For simplicity, the vertical component of the midpoint
is set here to zero. Evaluating the second derivative term in formula
(46) for the common-offset geometry leads, after some heavy
algebra, to the expression
|
(53) |
Substituting (53) into the general formula (46) yields
the weighting function for the common-offset true-amplitude
constant-velocity migration:
|
(54) |
Equation (54) is similar to the result obtained by
Sullivan and Cohen (1987). In the case of zero offset
,
it reduces to equation (49). Note that the value
of
in (54) corresponds to the two-dimensional (cylindric)
waves recorded on the seismic line. A special case is the 2.5-D inversion,
when the waves are assumed to be spherical, while the recording is on a line,
and the medium has cylindric symmetry. In this case, the modeling weighting
function (42) transforms to
(Deregowski and Brown, 1983; Bleistein, 1986)
|
(55) |
and the time filter is
. Combining this result with formula (53)
for
, we obtain the weighting function for the 2.5-D
common-offset migration in a constant velocity medium
(Sullivan and Cohen, 1987):
|
(56) |
The corresponding time filter for 2.5-D migration is
.
In the
common-offset case, the pseudo-unitary weighting is defined from
(47) and (53) as follows:
|
(57) |
where
|
(58) |
|
|
|
| Asymptotic pseudounitary stacking operators | |
|
Next: Post-Stack Time Migration
Up: Migration
Previous: 2. Zero-offset migration
2013-03-03