next up previous [pdf]

Next: Theory Up: Fomel: Velocity analysis using Previous: Fomel: Velocity analysis using

Introduction

Since its introduction by Taner and Koehler (1969), the semblance measure has been an indispensable tool for velocity analysis of seismic records. Conventional velocity analysis of seismic gathers scans different values of effective moveout velocity, computes semblance of flattened gathers and generates velocity spectra for later velocity picking (Yilmaz, 2000) .

While effective in most practical situations, semblance becomes troublesome in the case of strong variation of amplitudes along seismic events (Sarkar et al., 2001). A particular example is class II AVO anomalies (Rutherford and Williams, 1989) that cause seismic amplitudes to go through a polarity reversal. To address this problem, Ratcliffe and Adler (2000) and Sarkar et al. (2002,2001) developed algorithms for correcting the semblance measurement for amplitude variations.

In this paper, I interpret the semblance attribute as a correlation with a constant and derive an explicit mathematical expression for the measure which corresponds to correlation with an amplitude trend. This measure is equivalent to $ AB$ semblance proposed by Sarkar et al. (2002,2001). It reduces, in the case of constant amplitudes, to the conventional semblance. I analyze the statistics of the $ AB$ semblance attribute and quantify the loss of resolution associated with it. Numerical experiments with synthetic and field data demonstrate the effectiveness of the $ AB$ semblance as a robust velocity analysis attribute, which is applicable even in the presence of strong amplitude variations and polarity reversals. Moreover, the ratio of the $ AB$ and conventional semblances serves as a useful AVO indicator attribute.


next up previous [pdf]

Next: Theory Up: Fomel: Velocity analysis using Previous: Fomel: Velocity analysis using

2013-07-26