next up previous [pdf]

Next: Claerbout's straightedge method Up: Estimation of interval parameters Previous: Estimation of interval parameters

Dix Inversion

Applying the chain rule, we rewrite the Dix inversion formula (Dix, 1955) as follows:

$\displaystyle \hat{\mu}=\frac{d}{{d\tau }}\left[ {\tau _{0}(\tau )\mu (\tau )}\...
...] <tex2html_comment_mark>193 \left[ \frac{d{\tau }_{0}}{{d\tau }}\right] ^{-1}.$ (22)

where $ \hat{\mu}$ is a vertically-variable interval parameter, $ {\mu}$ is the corresponding effective parameter, and $ \tau_{0}(\tau)$ is the zero-slope time mapping function. Substituting the LHS of equations 9 and 10 as $ \mu$ and equation 15 as $ \tau _0$ , we deduce expressions for the interval NMO velocity $ \hat{V}_{N}$ , horizontal velocity $ \hat{V}_{H}$ , and the anellipticity parameter $ \hat{\eta}$ . The derivations and the final formulas are detailed in appendix B. In order to retrieve interval parameters by slope-based Dix inversion, one needs as inputs the slope $ R$ and the curvature $ Q$ fields as well as their derivatives along the time axis $ \tau $ (see Table 1). This confirms that, even in $ \tau $ -$ p$  , an application of Dix's formula requires the knowledge of the effective quantities which, in this context, are mathematically represented by the slope $ R$ and curvature $ Q$ . The $ \tau _0$ mapping field is also needed to map the estimated VTI parameters to the correct imaging time. The Dix inversion route does not seem very practical in the $ \tau $ -$ p$  domain because the equations (derived in appendix B) appear cumbersome.


next up previous [pdf]

Next: Claerbout's straightedge method Up: Estimation of interval parameters Previous: Estimation of interval parameters

2011-06-25