|
|
|
| Stacking seismic data using local correlation | |
|
Next: Stacking using local correlation
Up: Methodology
Previous: Methodology
The global uncentered correlation coefficient between two discrete
signals and can be defined as the functional
|
(1) |
where N is the length of a signal. The global correlation in equation 1
supplies only one number for the whole signal. For measuring the
similarity between two signals locally, one can define the sliding-window
correlation coefficient
|
(2) |
where is window length.
Fomel (2007a) proposes the local correlation attribute that identifies
local changes in signal similarity in a more elegant way. In a linear
algebra notation, the correlation coefficient in equation 1 can be
represented as a product of two least-squares inverses and :
|
(3) |
|
(4) |
|
(5) |
where and are vector notions for and
. Let and be two diagonal
operators composed of the elements of a and b. Localizing
equations 4 and 5 amounts to adding regularization to
inversion. Using shaping regularization (Fomel, 2007b), scalars
and turn into vectors and , defined as
|
(6) |
|
(7) |
where scaling controls relative scaling of operators
and and
where is a shaping operator such as Gaussian smoothing with an
adjustable radius. The component-wise product of vectors and
defines the local correlation measure. Local correlation is a measure
of the similarity between two signals.
An iterative, conjugate-gradient inversion for computing the inverse
operators can be applied in equations 6 and 7.
Interestingly, the output of the first iteration is equivalent to the
algorithm of fast local
cross-correlation proposed by Hale (2006).
|
|
|
| Stacking seismic data using local correlation | |
|
Next: Stacking using local correlation
Up: Methodology
Previous: Methodology
2013-03-02