![next](icons/next.png) |
![up](icons/up.png) |
![previous](icons/previous.png) |
![](icons/left.png) | Modeling of pseudo-acoustic P-waves in orthorhombic media with a lowrank approximation | ![](icons/right.png) |
![[pdf]](icons/pdf.png) |
Next: Dispersion Relation for Orthorhombic
Up: Theory
Previous: Theory
The acoustic wave equation is widely used in
forward seismic modeling and reverse-time migration (Bednar, 2005; Etgen et al., 2009):
![\begin{displaymath}
\frac{\partial^2p}{\partial t^2} = v(\mathbf{x})^2 \nabla^2p\;,
\end{displaymath}](img19.png) |
(1) |
where
is the seismic pressure wavefield
and
is the wave propagation velocity.
Assuming the model is homogeneous
,
after a Fourier transform in space,
we get the following explicit expression in the wavenumber domain:
![\begin{displaymath}
\frac{d^2\hat{p}}{dt^2} = -v_0^2\vert\mathbf{k}\vert^2\hat{p}\;,
\end{displaymath}](img23.png) |
(2) |
where
![\begin{displaymath}
\hat{p}(\mathbf{k},t)=\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}{p(\mathbf{x},t)e^{i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{x}}d\mathbf{x}}\;.
\end{displaymath}](img24.png) |
(3) |
Equation 2 has the following analytical solution:
![\begin{displaymath}
\hat{p}(\mathbf{k},t+\Delta t) = e^{\pm i\vert\mathbf{k}\vert v_0\Delta t}\hat{p}(\mathbf{k},t)\;,
\end{displaymath}](img25.png) |
(4) |
which leads to
the well-known second-order time-marching scheme (Etgen, 1989; Soubaras and Zhang, 2008) :
![$\displaystyle {p(\mathbf{x},t+\Delta t)+p(\mathbf{x},t-\Delta t) = }$](img26.png) |
|
|
![$\displaystyle 2\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}{\hat{p}(\mathbf{k},t)\cos(\vert\mathbf{k}\vert v_0\Delta t)e^{-i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{x}}d\mathbf{k}}\;.$](img27.png) |
(5) |
Equation 5 provides a very accurate and efficient solution
in the case of a constant-velocity medium with the aid of FFTs.
When the seismic wave velocity varies in the medium,
equation 5 turns into a reasonable approximation by replacing
with
, and taking small time steps,
.
However, FFTs can no longer be applied directly to evaluate
the inverse Fourier transform,
because a space-wavenumber mixed-domain term appears in the integral operation:
![\begin{displaymath}
W(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{k})=\cos(\vert\mathbf{k}\vert v(\mathbf{x})\Delta t).
\end{displaymath}](img29.png) |
(6) |
As a result, a straightforward numerical implementation of wave extrapolation
in a variable velocity medium with mixed-domain
matrix 6 will increase the cost from
to
,
the original cost for the homogeneous case,
in which
is the total size of the three-dimensional space grid.
A number of numerical methods (Fomel et al., 2010; Du et al., 2010; Song et al., 2013,2011; Song and Fomel, 2011; Etgen and Brandsberg-Dahl, 2009; Liu et al., 2009; Zhang and Zhang, 2009; Fomel et al., 2012)
have been proposed to overcome this mixed-domain problem.
In the case of orthorhombic acoustic modeling,
we derive a new phase operator
to replace
of the isotropic model.
We describe the details in the next section.
![next](icons/next.png) |
![up](icons/up.png) |
![previous](icons/previous.png) |
![](icons/left.png) | Modeling of pseudo-acoustic P-waves in orthorhombic media with a lowrank approximation | ![](icons/right.png) |
![[pdf]](icons/pdf.png) |
Next: Dispersion Relation for Orthorhombic
Up: Theory
Previous: Theory
2013-06-25